Archive for the ‘Behind the Scenes’ Category

Take a Step into Our World

We’re going to try something a little bit different today, we’re planning to broadcast live video directly from Sidepodcast HQ.

Every week prior to a Grand Prix, we film Christine’s piece to camera for the video podcast Inside Track. We discussed what goes into that process earlier in the week and seeing as a few people found it interesting we thought we’d show you what actually goes on during recording. Oh yeah, and we decided to do it unedited and raw… we promise to watch our language.

Update: The live stream has now finished. We’ve updated the video player to show the recorded session.

The Magic of Chroma Key (Part 2)

In part 1 of our behind-the-scenes look at chroma keying, we covered humble beginnings and the nightmare’s encountered therein. In part 2, let’s look at how we solved some of the issues while creating ourselves some brand new ones.

Going Pro

We struggled on with the duvet cover for as long as we could (ironing it actually made a significant difference) but the truth is, it just wasn’t good enough. We made a total of 13 videos before giving in and purchasing a professional green / blue screen.

Christine in front of a screen and the replaced background

The new backdrop made its debut on the Italy preview show and the results were instantly impressive. The screen folds away inside a soft bag which means some creases are still apparent, but when opened it remains flat and is very luminous in colour, making post-processing a relative breeze.

The Magic of Chroma Key (Part 1)

Seeing as there’s a brief lull in the racing action at the moment, we might just be able to squeeze in a quick behind the scenes look at green screen technology. I should declare upfront that this post isn’t remotely related to Formula 1, but a couple of people have expressed an interest in the inner workings of Sidepodcast, so please excuse the self indulgence.

The Early Years

The idea of keying out a single colour from a piece of film has been around since the 1930’s. The principle is simple, pick a solid colour as a backdrop, ensure that it’s not present in the foreground and then replace said colour with other footage during post-production. The techniques for doing this have dramatically improved in the last 70-odd years (while costs have drastically reduced), but the original concept remains the same.

Chroma keying is used in all forms of video production nowadays, the local weather programme is the most commonly seen example, but given its relatively low cost, there’s little reason not to make some use of the technology.

That’s Me in the Spotlight

Although we essentially have no knowledge of television production, when we started making videos it was pretty clear that chroma keying was a great way to turn a very small space into a larger one, and as all we had was a small space, it was worth looking into.

Of Age and Gender

YouTube announced an update to their stats pages yesterday, and although I’m still quite mad at them, statistics are something I can never resist.

We like a good pie chart here at Sidepodcast and YouTube delivers the goods with their latest update, in fact we also get our hands on some demographics we’ve never had the opportunity to see before - ages and gender.

First up I should say that this data set is slightly flawed, because it relies on viewers not only being logged into das tube, but also that they tell the truth in their profiles too. Additionally, it doesn’t account for viewers logged in as someone else (as so often happens here when I browse using Christine’s profile).

That said, the charts are of a certain amount of use so for the basis of this post I’ve picked stats from last week’s Turkey Preview video. It’s been live for almost 7 days and offers plenty of data to work with (at the time the screenshots were taken 4,478 unique views).

Let’s take a look at the demographic data relating to ages:

Viewer's age range

Video Podcast Chapters

As you may well know, we’ve included chapter selection within our enhanced weekly audio shows since day one, to allow for easy navigation of lengthy episodes. At times this has caused a bit of confusion because it means we’re putting out two versions of every show, one in MP3 format for the majority of listeners and an enhanced version in AAC format for anyone with an iPod or iTunes.

Although this approach does create a bit of extra work, we’ve always figured it to be worth it, in order to benefit from the additional interactivity the enhanced format provides (along with chapters, we also add images and website links). The feeds page details the various options for downloading both versions, as well as how to subscribe to our video podcasts, and it’s these that I’m keen to talk more about today.

It’s possible to add chapter markers to video episodes too, although we couldn’t really see the point when shows rarely stretch beyond the 6 minute mark, especially given that chapter navigation wasn’t particularly user friendly either. That all changed though, with the release of an update in February to Apple’s iPhone and iPod Touch (or iTouch as I prefer it) firmware.

We’ve talked about how good the iTouch is for viewing widescreen video podcasts before, but this software update added something unique - a chapter guide:

Sidepodcast TV and the 2008 Season (Part 2)

In part one we looked into the problems we faced when considering a second season of F1 video podcasting. In part two, we’ll look into some of the things we’re doing to stay fresh and up-to-date.

A Video Forum

On the same day that Renault released their R28 challenger in Paris, Sidepodcast was at the Broadcast Live and VideoForum in London. This forum is the traditional stomping ground for the great and the good of the British television industry… and Keith Chegwin (don’t ask).

You might think we’d be a little out of place in such company, but the thing is, we don’t do “video clips” and we have no interest in simply being a conduit for whatever video press release an F1 team decides to push out this week. We want to create brand new and original Formula 1 content, so although nothing we create goes anywhere near a television station, we’re sort of making TV.

It turns out that our trip wasn’t at all in vain, and the forum turned over a wealth of ideas that gave us a whole new viewpoint on the possibilities of video creativity. Aside from the millions of pounds worth of television equipment stacked high inside Earls Court 2, there were a whole bunch of fantastically invaluable seminars to sit in on. Also, Sequence Post Production were in attendance - F1 fans may recognise the name as the company behind Martin Brundle’s brilliant F1 Insight series - and they were an amazingly helpful bunch of people.

Sidepodcast TV and the 2008 Season (Part 1)

Now that we’re getting into the swing of the 2008 season, and seeing as we’re coming up to the anniversary of our very first Formula 1 preview video, I thought it might be worth taking stock of what we’re doing in terms of visual content this year.

Because the subject is a bit long winded, I’ve split this behind-the-scenes post into two parts. You can view part two here.

Previewing History

As you may know, we sort of fell into video podcasting by accident, and only planned on creating a couple of shows a year, filming footage at various events we attended. This idea was based on the fact that we knew Formula One Management had notoriously strict rulings on who could use racing footage, and back then none of those restrictions covered online viewing.

Our plans changed however, when almost exactly a year ago we were watching a motorsports program on television, and the presenter took us on a 3D virtual tour of the Bahrain circuit. They didn’t do a particularly great job of the narration and we thought we could do better, so after sourcing the 3D animation and figuring out how on earth Blue Screen technology works, we made the Bahrain preview video.

Looking back, it feels like a lifetime ago.

Podcasting Show Notes

Podcast show notes in close up

One of the things that has been consistently changing over the course of the first year at Sidepodcast, is the show notes we refer to when recording.

The first two shows we ever made – my 2006 championship review – were entirely scripted. If you’ve heard them, this will come as no surprise I’m sure. I was not at all confident about talking out loud and to be fair, I wasn’t totally sure I knew what I was saying. I’d read a few other reviews of the season and cobbled together my own.

The co-host was, of course, quite happy just to stand in front of the mic and throw in his comments as and when he felt like it.

After that first show, we realised that it probably wasn’t going to make a great podcast, listening to me reading out a previously written script. It was immediately obvious that it needed to be more of a conversation, but how much we needed to write down and how much would come naturally remains a matter of great consternation between us.

Fast Photography

This post is part an occasional series from Sidepodcast, giving you a behind the scenes look at podcasting, specifically in the Formula 1 genre. We want to share the pitfalls, the problems, and the triumphs that go into making the show what it is. As this is a joint effort, to provide you with both sides of the story, I will be writing in plain text, whilst the geeky one will add his two cents in italics.

David Coulthard at Autosport International 2006

The above picture looks pretty good, right? David Coulthard isn’t exactly hard on the eye, it’s in focus, it’s framed nicely by the crowd of people and the Autosport backdrop. Generally, it’s fair to say that’s a good photograph. Not perfect, not outstanding, but good. We don’t claim to be professional photographers, but we do like to snap a good shot, and the above is a prime example of that.

It wasn’t always this way.

David Coulthard at Autosport International 2005

That picture is truly awful. It was taken in 2005, with the first digital camera we owned. It was small, it wasn’t designed for heavy use, and as you can see by the blurry DC, it wasn’t really designed for close up’s either. Immediately after taking the above, we elbowed our way to the front of another crowd of people, this time lining his route from the signing podium out of the public eye. When his time was up, he strode over towards us, spotted me trying to take his picture, paused, smiled and went on his way.

I stamped my foot, swore a little bit, and threw the camera on the floor in disgust. It couldn’t cope with a moving object, even one that was paused for a second or two. It wouldn’t even take the shot, it just refused anything that was even slightly blurred. And yet it was fine taking the ridiculous mess above.

The very next time we were in town, we bought a new, better camera.

Thus the header pic for this post, taken at Autosport International 2006, was taken, without any swearing whatsoever.

If I were being picky, I’d say that the focus on the top picture is a little soft and the woman in the Honda hat is the devil. It is without question a darn sight better than the second picture though, and I do prefer it when there’s no swearing involved.

So, now we have a camera that takes a good picture indoors, works with people even if they’re moving, has scope to add whatever lens you want, and is generally a trusty little thing. Not so little, actually, it gets heavy after a long day dragging it around in search of F1 cars. But I imagine any decent camera would be the same.

For the technically inclined, the camera is a Canon 350D, which was purchased during the height of it’s popularity but has since been somewhat superseded.

As I understand it the lens is often as important, if not more important than the body and for that we used to have a Tamron 70-300mm. Sadly, it disagreed with Britain’s idea of a summer and broke during the Silverstone GP weekend. It’s since been replaced by a similar model made by Sigma.

Blurry Photograph at Silverstone 2007

The next step in our discovery of just what it takes to be a Formula 1 photographer, was to turn up at an actual Grand Prix and see what we could get out of there. Let me tell you something that should be obvious but needs reiterating in this context - those cars are fast! Forget about a single driver walking in a straight line towards you, stopping and smiling. Try snapping a picture of an F1 car approaching a corner at high speed. It takes some practice and we are absolutely by no means perfect, but after Silverstone testing for a couple of days, and then three whole days of the Grand Prix, we managed to capture some decent shots.

This is what I believe to be ‘hit and miss’ photography. Memory cards are cheap and have huge capacities, so keep pointing and clicking in the hope that something good comes out of it.

In years gone by we’d have wasted hundreds of rolls of film, luckily technology caught up in time to save our backsides.

Toyota at Silverstone 2007

Brendan often comments about the number of pictures of pretty girls there are on our site, compared to the number of cars. But look at this:

Pretty Girls at Autosport International

They are standing still, posing, looking beautiful, just waiting for you to take their picture. In fact, the whole reason they are there is for you to take their photograph.

The one problem we do have with the booth girls is the artificial lighting used at some of these venues. You can see it in the picture above, the girls all look a bit too orange. We need to work on that some more this year methinks.

We’re always learning, and we always want to get better. With F1 cars, I imagine, it’s always going to be an uphill struggle, but it’s definitely fun trying.

Part of the problem we have is that photography isn’t the main thing that we do, but the results do enhance the site considerably.

It is the basis of endless debates in the Sidepodcast household, whether or not official glass made by Canon is worth the additional expense (in most cases, twice the equivalent price). If anyone has any experience in this area, especially relating to taking pictures of fast cars, we’d love to hear about it.

Bar Steward Vista

This is the first in an occasional series from Sidepodcast, giving you a behind the scenes look at podcasting, specifically in the Formula 1 genre. We want to share the pitfalls, the problems, and the triumphs that go into making the show what it is. As this is a joint effort, to provide you with both sides of the story, I will be writing in plain text, whilst the geeky one will add his two cents in italics.

I’ve always been on the PC side of the Mac vs. PC debate. I appreciate everything that a Mac is and I will gladly stand up and say it is easier to use, has some stunning applications, makes you want to create stuff, and is generally just better than a PC. But, I am a control freak and there’s something about Finder that puts me off. The thought of it makes me anxious. How will I ever find anything? The file structure, it scares me.

I did use a Mac for about six months a few years ago, and I don’t remember it being a problem, but just a simple glimpse of the Finder icon brings me out in cold sweats.

True. As a person sitting on the Mac side of the debate, I’d agree that the worst thing about Apple’s operating system is file navigation. It’s better in the new version, but still geared to finding files rather than organising them correctly in the first place.

I had a PC laptop and life was good. Then, gradually, it wasn’t so good. It was slow, there wasn’t enough hard drive space, and sometimes the screen wouldn’t start when you switched it on. I was getting frustrated, and I needed to upgrade.

I knew about Vista. Trust me. I’d listened to enough TWiT podcasts to know that Vista left a lot to be desired. But I figured that the little annoyances everyone seemed to be talking about were worth the fact that I would be upgrading to better hardware.

Ha.

Very, very silly.

Soon after Vista was my operating software of choice, I started to hear audio glitches whilst creating podcasts. Some of them were simple ‘clicks’ on playback, some were ‘pops’ in the recording. There was the occasional glitch in recording that was much, much worse, almost as though it had skipped a word. If it was a tape, I’d imagine that the tape had folded over on itself and covered up a second of recording. So far, I’ve been using my editing skills to the max to either chop out the damaged audio, or at least minimise the effects.

Can’t say I’ve noticed, so you must’ve done a pretty good job. What I have noticed is the incessant swearing coming from your direction since the upgrade, so I imagine it hasn’t been much fun.

Obviously, we’ve been narrowing down where the problem actually occurs but all the signs point to how Adobe Audition works with Windows Vista. The download trial of Audition 3 was supposed to be my saviour, but the glitches still occur, and there’s another problem to add to the mix.

Load up Audition and it works fine. After five minutes, it gets sticky and slow. You’re moving something, you’re clicking somewhere, and it takes a second or two to catch up. It sounds like nothing when I’m writing it down, but it is not at all practical, and I find myself having to restart the software. Every. Five. Minutes.

Ahh, the Adobe approach to software development strikes again. Release early and patch later sounds familiar. It’s a shame because Audition 2 was a great bit of software, version 3 is sadly worse than useless.

It seems like the only way to work with Microsoft at the moment is to downgrade everything. Audition 3 is bad, so stick with Audition 2. Vista is laughable, better to stick with XP. I just can’t fathom how a company as big as Microsoft could be satisfied to produce something so bad that it’s better not to upgrade.

Personally I blame Bernie, not for any specific reason, but it must be his fault somehow.

I heard PC World’s hardware sales recently dropped so low, that they had to re-introduce XP machines to the shelves. A rather embarrassing affair all round. don’t worry though a new OS will be available in a few years.

Like I said at the start, I’ve always been on the PC side of Mac vs PC. But now…