Posts Tagged ‘Ferrari’

Every Now and Then I Fall Apart

I think I mentioned in the Canada podcast, that Massa has really taken a step up in my estimation. Previous to this season, I thought of him as a bit of a no-hoper, clinging on to the coat tails of Michael Schumacher. A harsh assumption, but it was just that, an initial opinion based on very little evidence. He came a very second best to Raikkonen last year, and so I’d basically written him off.

Turnaround

So, what’s changed? I’m going to pin it all on Monaco. Massa was having a dire start to the season - three races in, zero points, Raikkonen dominating, not a lot to look forward to. Then Monaco came along and everything was different. It began with the usual pre-qualifying excuses, that he didn’t like the track and wasn’t expecting to do well. But he stormed out there and took pole position, surprising everyone, including himself. I don’t remember the exact words, but afterwards his race engineer Rob Smedley said they had both worked like the devil on the track and on Massa’s mind. It clearly worked and something had clicked.

Total Eclipse

Since then, it’s been all good for Felipe. He may not always take the win, as in Canada, but he’s always there, a thorn in the other driver’s side, challenging them. Whilst everyone was panicking about the track breaking up at Montreal, Massa was there, cool as you like, ready to take it as it comes. The results will surely follow.

Nikolas Tombazis Video Interview

I’m really enjoying some up the videos Ferrari have been putting up onto YouTube recently. While lacking in the production values of say Honda Racing TV, they do offer a unique perspective on the team. The latest video is an interview with chief designer Nikolas Tombazis.

Somehow the producers have achieved a retro vibe that’s so convincing I had to double check it hadn’t actually been filmed in the 70’s, but it’s definitely modern.

Mr. T (as only I call him) reveals some insightful information about the difficulties the team faced getting their new hollow nose through the mandatory crash test, as well as how the team are preparing for the 2009 regulations.

If you haven’t seen it already, it’s worth five minutes of your time, if only because I’m interested to hear if you think he’s drunk on duty or not?

Ferrari: A Change of Heart

There are a few not very widely promoted suggestions that Ferrari’s win in Malaysia may have been one of those team order affairs. According to this story on Formula 1 Sport, Gary Anderson – a grand prix car designer – believes that Raikkonen being able to leapfrog Massa had been planned from the start.

Now, I don’t know who Gary Anderson is, whether he is a respected voice in the sport of not, but I can say I’m not a fan of this conspiracy theory. And I am a fan of a lot of conspiracy theories.

I believe that Kimi Raikkonen is just that good, and Massa is not. Given the evidence of previous GPs, this isn’t exactly a stretch to believe, is it?

The reason this story is getting my attention, however, is because when Stefano Domenicali was accepting his trophy on the Malaysian podium, I turned to “me” and said: “I don’t know when it happened, but I don’t feel the same animosity towards Ferrari. It doesn’t feel tainted.”

When I first started watching F1, and watching should be in quotes, because I couldn’t tell you a thing about it back then, it was Michael Schumacher this and Michael Schumacher that. Questionable wins here, dodgy tactics there.

Episode 55 - Do You Think They’ve Got a Better System this Year than a Guy with a Felt Tip Marker?

Sidepodcast logo

Just seven days to go, this episode is of the shorter variety, as we at Sidepodcast get everything ready for next week’s podcast explosion.

Intro

The seasons almost upon us, can’t quite contain our excitement.

Good Week / Bad Week

ITV find their sponsor, whilst Force India aren’t quite free of Spyker yet. Mercedes have a new safety car, and Nigel Stepney is in the bad books.

News and Views

Trulli’s mood and some sneaky last minute preparations from Honda, Ferrari, Williams and Red Bull. Bridgestone do more white lines and we share our predictions.

Episode 53 - They’ve Got the Drivers, They’ve Got the Money, What Can Go Wrong?

Sidepodcast logo

Last week we looked at the drivers taking to the grid, these week we look closer at the 2008 contenders - the teams, how they’ve changed and how they will fare.

Intro

A quick update on the status of my bad luck - this week is better but I have proof that last week was the worst ever.

Good Week / Bad Week

Bernie Ecclestone gets someone onside, Super Aguri can’t find anyone, Fuji are looking to stay in the sport, and which one is Pinocchio Schumacher?

News and Views

Alonso has his main sponsor following him around, so does that means he’s a pay driver? We’re worried about the state of mind of Toyota drivers, they seem unable to stick to an opinion. And we briefly recap a very wet testing session, and discover we’re looking forward to the return of a previously disliked figure.

Episode 46 - It’s Like Fantasy F1

Sidepodcast logo

A welcome return for the audio half of Sidepodcast, this first show of 2008 covers some of the news stories that have cropped up over the holiday period. We also introduce a couple of new segments to the show, and as ever, solicit some feedback.

Intro

Mobile phone fun, as the new theme tune is uncovered in grand, theatrical style. Or not.

Good Week / Bad Week

A new part of the show, featuring some of the shorter news items of recent days. This week featuring Super Aguri, Toyota and Autosport International. I’ll leave you to guess who fits in which category.

Ferrari Launch Interviews

Today, Ferrari were the first of the teams to launch their 2008 challenger, and YouTube user yossidlr provides us with the media interviews conducted at the launch.

Slightly long winded, and not the world’s most exciting unveiling, but worth 10 minutes of your time if you’re after the full low down from Kimi & Co.

Watch the drivers talk about the new ECU for 2008, and remind yourself that it really is “the same for everybody”.

Selective Amnesia

Earlier in the year we were planning all sorts of fun things for the month of December, on the assumption that just like last year, it would be a very quiet month. We couldn’t have been more wrong, and yesterday was just the icing on the cake.

Time For Closure

Thursday started innocuously with Max Mosely threatening slick tyres may not necessarily be a shoe-in for 2009, unless aerodynamicists deliver on their promises to cut downforce by 50pc. If ever there was a story in need of burying, this was it.

Dutifully, Mutua Madrilena provided the necessary, by announcing they wouldn’t be sponsoring McLaren next year. Allegedly this had nothing to do with Alonso leaving the team, despite the fact that they sponsored him at Renault and then followed him to McLaren for ‘07. You can almost certainly expect them to end up back at Renault early next year.

Said sponsors exit was rapidly followed up by a public request from McLaren’s Martin Whitmarsh, asking the FIA for a swift end to the spying investigations, because it was hurting their sourcing of replacement sponsors. The team issued an unreserved apology for it’s inferred use of Ferrari data and suggested a development amnesty on certain parts of next year’s car, in return for closure.

In response, the FIA produced a press release saying Max had asked the WMSC to consider this issue closed - in the interests of the sport, of course. They also managed to dig out a 21 page technical report detailing some of the findings discovered during the investigation into McLaren’s 2008 car. A pretty impressive response, considering there’s still no sign of the Renault hearing transcripts over a week after the case was heard.

Finally, just to end the day on a high, Ferrari released a statement stating that they respect the FIA’s plan to bring closure to the situation, but are still planning to sue the backside off of all and sundry.

Revelations

McLaren and Ferrari motorhome's at the Silverstone GP 2007
What did we learn from the information distributed yesterday? Not a heck of a lot as it happens. Given that over half of the technical document had been removed for confidentiality reasons and the appendices are missing. It’s fun to note that this time the FIA decided to first erase the secret information, then print the document, before scanning it back in for digital distribution. Presumably this is their solution to document management in the modern era?

It is possible to fill in the missing information by using the September transcripts, but it’ll take a while and in some cases will be no more than simple guesswork. A unique exercise for the future, maybe.

What we did learn is that several McLaren employees suffer from what is described as ’selective amnesia’, whereby they’ve conveniently forgotten how certain information arrived at the company. We learn that there were more internal references to a ‘whistleblower’ and a ‘mole’, but nothing appears to be proven beyond a doubt. More than anything, this serves to justify the penalties brought about in September rather than suggest anything improper on next years car.

On that subject, we learn that McLaren’s 2008 entry appears to bear some similarities to the length of this year’s Ferrari, but I’m sure many teams will arrive with a longer wheelbase vehicle next year. Possibly that’s why the FIA wanted other teams to review the document before the planned February hearing. Suspicious coincidences also surround the use of a unique rear braking system, presumably this is a double-rear master cylinder with a spring.

Beyond that, there’s not too much to suggest McLaren would’ve had much to worry about next year. There’s always a chance we’ve missed something significant that was removed for confidentiality reasons, but it’s difficult to understand why the team decided to fall on it’s sword, the way it did yesterday. Possibly, unless something was done very soon, the team would be in a sorry financial state come the start of next year and this approach was the lesser of two evils.

In Conclusion

Mercedes logo on a McLaren transporter at Goodwood FOS 2007
All said and done, a significant day in the history of Formula 1, if only because it’s the first time this year that the various parties have finally got their act together and produced a coordinated set of press releases, instead of the ‘he said / she said’ ping pong we’ve put up with most of the year.

The sport finally looks to have it’s house in order, although no doubt more details are still to come out from Ferrari’s court cases and Nigel Stepney’s planned book.

Assuming Max’s request is accepted by the WMSC next week, McLaren can move on with it’s 2008 plans and find a replacement sponsor (or several, as we’re still expecting Vodafone to take over as the series title sponsors, sooner rather than later). Additionally as the supplier of the single ECU, the team have a material advantage over the rest of the field next year, so the amnesty on development shouldn’t hurt them too much.

The FIA are happy, as on the surface their actions this year appear to have been vindicated. They got the apology they were after and 2008 should begin with a mostly clean sheet of paper.

Finally fans of the sport can begin to look forward, instead of back. No doubt there’s more to be analysed and discussed, but the Renault hearing transcripts aside, the remaining few weeks of the year should be nice and peaceful.

Amen to that.

Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile

Yesterday was a bit of a busy day for the FIA. Firstly, there was the release of a document explaining Renault’s non-penalty for unauthorised possesion. This was swiftly followed by the announcement that McLaren will have to wait until February for a conclusion regarding their 2008 entry. At the same time, a raft of proposals relating to next year’s aero restrictions were listed, and then the FIA casually mentioned a plan to sue the backside off The Sunday Times newspaper.

Finally to wrap the day up, awards were handed out at the annual gala to Kimi and Ferrari for the 2007 drivers and constructors championships. Not your average day by any stretch.

The Renault Decision

Reading through the text of the descision it would appear that there are a lot of similarities with McLaren’s July hearing (where they too were found guilty, but received no punishment). Experience tells us that the full transcripts will be more revealing than words contained in a carefully selected summary, so we’ll come back to this subject once they become available.

The McLaren Decision

I am baffled by the reasons for deferring the status of McLaren’s 2008 entry until February next year. One has to assume all is not well if there’s a need to call an extraordinary general meeting.

Inviting members of McLaren, Ferrari and ‘other competitors’ to make representations based on the FIA Technical Department’s report, suggests that all teams will have the opportunity read the details, which in turn inevitably means certain content will leak. We can expect more ‘media campaigns’ and ‘clarifications’ well into 2008, as teams battle for off-track supremacy as well as on.

Aero Rules

The new aero regulations need more analysis, but I think it’s pretty obvious that the teams need to find a way of renewing the Concorde agreement (that expires at the end of December) pretty damn quick. Otherwise, pretty soon they’ll find themselves committed to a World Championship they have no interest in competing in.

That Legal Thing

Right at the bottom of the F1-related information contained within the FIA press release was the following sentence:

The WMSC has authorised the FIA to issue libel proceedings against English newspaper The Sunday Times, which ran an article claiming that the FIA was engaged in a witch-hunt against the McLaren-Mercedes team.

The article in question was penned by some commentator chap called Martin Brundle, and if you care to read it you’ll note that it’s not particularly damning. In fact, compared to a lot of things said about the FIA in recent months, it’s positively benign. So why the case and why now?

My guess is the FIA are keen to exert yet more control on the way the media report on F1. Not content with deciding who gets paddock passes and who misses out, the Federation are now wielding the big libel stick, and casually waving it in the direction of anyone who dares raise objections to their rulings.

There’s next to no chance that this case will succeed, but by picking a high-profile and very public target, it’ll force anyone with a negative opinion to think twice before publishing anything. If paddock insiders weren’t paranoid before, it’s a safe bet they are now. Expect many more off-the-record comments as all and sundry watch their backs.

Awards and Stuff

Max, Fernando, Prince Albert of Monaco, Lewis and Kimi (photo copyright FIA)
The day did end on a positive note though, as all good stories should, with Kimi picking up his WDC gong and Jean Todt getting his mitts on the Constructors trophy. The top three drivers were in attendance (as they are legally obliged to be), and Fernando Alonso had some suspiciously nice things to say about Team Macca:

This has been another exciting season because my car was competitive from start to finish. From this perspective the team did a fantastic job.

I’d love to know what the terms of his split with McLaren were, because he didn’t pay them that many compliments when he was part of the team.

Conclusion

A hell of day in Monaco by all accounts. Formula 1 still isn’t free from spying controversies and how McLaren go about preparing for the coming season is anyone’s guess. The team have thus far remained silent regarding Thursday’s hearing. The Italian motorsport authority managed to stir up enough media coverage to force an appeal back in July, we’ll have to see if Ron and the boys fancy playing that particular hand.

Days that Shook the F1 World (Part 5) - Monaco Qualifying, 2006

Sidepodcast logo

Welcome to Sidepodcast’s Days that Shook the F1 World, a series sharing some of the more pivotal moments in F1 History. Today, the 27th May 2006.

Michael Schumacher had already won twice in 2006, but was still struggling for form against defending champion Fernando Alonso. In the back of his mind he might have known this would be his last season and therefore his last race in the principality. Desperation may be been starting to set in.

Qualifying began as it always did, with the first of the three sessions. Notably, Felipe Massa crashed out in the sister Ferrari, causing red flags and plenty of chaos. Whatever help Michael may have expected from Felipe was immediately out of the window, and Ferrari’s race strategy was further compromised because Massa would likely start last in Sunday’s Grand Prix.

The second session passed without event, and the majority of the third session evolved predictably.

As the session drew to a close, Schumacher began his last attempt at a flying lap, but he lost two tenths somewhere in the middle sector. Aware that he could not make up that kind of deficit in the remainder of the lap and aware that his closest rival was behind him on the track, he got out of shape around the hairpin at Rascasse, pulling to a stop inches from the barrier.

The Ferrari was stuck in a dangerous position, so marshals had to wave their yellow flags, ensuring that a following Fernando Alonso had no choice but to slow down and abort his lap. How convenient.

The big question was: did Schumacher do it deliberately or was it merely a mistake?

Ferrari absolutely denied the former. It was an accident, a pure racing incident with no malice intended.

The entire pit lane rallied against this claim. How could it be an accident? The man was a master at Monaco, he missed the barriers by inches, meaning Alonso’s lap was ruined while the Ferrari suffered no damage. Surely an act of evil genius?

The stewards investigated, ruled Schumacher had done wrong, and pushed him to the back of the grid meaning both Ferraris would start from the back row, making it the teams worst ever qualifying position. During the race, Schumacher wowed everyone by fighting his way through the traffic and ended up in the top eight. No one denied the man could drive.

But that didn’t matter. The event caused a reaction completely unprecedented in the F1 World. Previous attempts to disrupt the course of a GP weekend by Schumacher and/or his team were now viewed in a new light. How could you believe that his accidents with championship rivals Damon Hill and Jacques Villeneuve in previous years, were simply mistakes? Fans were instantly reminded of his other misdemeanours, and now excuses were much less credible.

If he did do it on purpose, it revealed an enormous amount about Michael Schumacher’s character. Being a seven times world champion clearly wasn’t enough, and even though he claimed to always want to win everything fair and square, a little underhand technique every now and then wasn’t completely out of the question.

Prior to Monaco ‘06, when an incident occurred where questionable tactics had been used, the pit lane traditionally stayed quiet, had some time to think about it, and then responded via press releases and lawyers. After this event though, no one was backwards in coming forward. The entire pit lane erupted with scorn and derision, crying “cheat” and demanding action. Of course, they got what they wanted, and a new precedent was born. If you have an opinion on any subject, better to share it immediately, loudly, and to anyone who cares to listen.

Most importantly though, this event took place as fans were becoming more vocal too. Bloggers were just waiting for a controversial event to get their teeth into, and Michael Schumacher well and truly delivered. Everyone had an opinion, whether for or against the German, and now everyone could have their say.

Coverage of Formula 1 was changing, and this was the first major event to have everyone call it – cheater, evil genius or genuine mistake?

That’s all for our fifth important date. Join me tomorrow for another Day that Shook the F1 World.

Theme music: Dylan in the Movies, Better Days and Causeway, Change in My Lifetime.