Posts Tagged ‘Williams’

F1 People - Adrian Newey

Sidepodcast mini-series logo

Welcome to the penultimate episode of F1 People, a second series of seven short shows dedicated to profiling the important names in Formula 1. So far this series we’ve looked at both drivers, commentators, and the brains behind the car. Today we return to the latter subject, with Adrian Newey.

Adrian Newey was born on December 26th 1958 in Stratford-Upon-Avon, in the UK. He did not enjoy school, but worked hard enough to attend the University of Southampton. He gained a First Class honours degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the age of 22. His final thesis was on ground effects. Newey immediately joined the Fittipaldi Formula 1 team straight out of university and began working in motorsport. In 1981, he joined March and began to design the cars. His first was the March GTP sports car that won the GTP title two years in a row. Then he moved to March’s Indycar team, and worked on the 1984 car. Another successfully designed car took seven victories in its first year, and the title for the next two. Newey worked as both a designer and a race engineer, becoming close friends with his title winning driver Bobby Rahal.

Day 1 - A Couple More Images

I hope a picture paints a thousand words, because I have much to say but I’m just too tired. Here’s a few more shots from the first day of Silverstone testing.

Nelson Piquet

Up close and personal with Nelshino. The guy was in a surprisingly good mood until his engine went ‘pop’ on the main straight around 3 o’clock and that was after he had a slow start to the morning session.
Nelson winding it up
When sitting in the pits the helmet visor can be used much like a pair of sunglasses, obscuring the drivers eyes as he waits patiently for the mechanics to go about their business. It was nice of him to open the lid for a brief moment before he set off for another run.

An Exciting Friday for F1

It’s been ages since I felt the need to grab a screenshot from the f1.com live timing screens, but Friday free practice two was just such an occasion.

The day had got off to a bit of a slow start with all teams opting to sit in their garages for the first 25 minutes of session one, and it looked like all of last week’s testing had conspired to make this Friday a dull day.

However, during the break before practice two, I get the impression that a number of teams figured they didn’t have as much information as they needed, because from the off it was action all the way through the second session.

Force India top the timesheets

Episode 55 - Do You Think They’ve Got a Better System this Year than a Guy with a Felt Tip Marker?

Sidepodcast logo

Just seven days to go, this episode is of the shorter variety, as we at Sidepodcast get everything ready for next week’s podcast explosion.

Intro

The seasons almost upon us, can’t quite contain our excitement.

Good Week / Bad Week

ITV find their sponsor, whilst Force India aren’t quite free of Spyker yet. Mercedes have a new safety car, and Nigel Stepney is in the bad books.

News and Views

Trulli’s mood and some sneaky last minute preparations from Honda, Ferrari, Williams and Red Bull. Bridgestone do more white lines and we share our predictions.

Sporting Business

If Prodrive ever do make it to the grid, there will be another very fierce rivalry to cope with. Not only will we have McLaren vs Ferrari, and Alonso vs. The World, we will have to contend with Prodrive vs. Williams.

David Richards has had a bit of a rant about Williams, upset that they played such an integral role in blocking his 2008 F1 entry. He’s called them outdated, and financially unstable, and my favourite quote of all:

“It’s run by people who want to go motor racing, not by people who want to run a business.”

Because that is so outrageous, you know, people in motor sport actually wanting to race!

Seriously though, we all know that it wasn’t completely Williams fault – they threatened legal action if the team entered, but they couldn’t have actually done anything to stop the team participating. The real issues lie, as all of them seem to do, with the Concorde Agreement. Or perhaps, with the lack of a Concorde Agreement.

Without this, it’s almost impossible to plan ahead, to secure sponsors, and therefore, get your entry together.

Episode 53 - They’ve Got the Drivers, They’ve Got the Money, What Can Go Wrong?

Sidepodcast logo

Last week we looked at the drivers taking to the grid, these week we look closer at the 2008 contenders - the teams, how they’ve changed and how they will fare.

Intro

A quick update on the status of my bad luck - this week is better but I have proof that last week was the worst ever.

Good Week / Bad Week

Bernie Ecclestone gets someone onside, Super Aguri can’t find anyone, Fuji are looking to stay in the sport, and which one is Pinocchio Schumacher?

News and Views

Alonso has his main sponsor following him around, so does that means he’s a pay driver? We’re worried about the state of mind of Toyota drivers, they seem unable to stick to an opinion. And we briefly recap a very wet testing session, and discover we’re looking forward to the return of a previously disliked figure.

It’s Just Plane Odd

The Williams F1 team continued to push the boundaries of acceptable marketing strategies this week, when they painted a passenger aircraft in their familiar racing livery.

AirAsia Airbus A320-216 painted in F1 livery

TG Daily reports that an odd looking Airbus A320 was delivered to Malaysian low-cost carrier AirAsia yesterday. Sporting a striking blue and white colour scheme, the plane was covered in many of the logos from the team’s main sponsors, while the tail proudly reminds eveyone that AirAsia are the official airline for the AT&T Williams Formula One team.

Days that Shook the F1 World - Last Cosworth Races, 2006

Sidepodcast mini-series logo

Welcome to Days that Shook the F1 World, a Sidepodcast series dedicated to bringing you some of the important dates in F1 History. We’ve looked at races and at controversies so far, and in this sixth episode, we’ll look at the disappearance of a legendary name. The date, October 22nd 2006.

Whilst the final race of an engine manufacturer may not have as much hard-hitting foundation-rocking emphasis as other specific days in Formula 1, Cosworth bowing out after almost forty years in the sport is just as important as any other headline.

Their final race came in Brazil, 2006, where Fernando’s second championship success overshadowed the exit of a supplier who had been in F1 since 1966. Back then, they entered their first season supplying no less than three teams – Stebro, Lotus and Brabham – with engines. By 1967, they were on winning form with the Lotus-Ford.

From a company that began in 1958, with Mike Costin and Keith Duckworth at the helm, the reputation for building strong race engines with high performance levels and excellent support from engineers built very rapidly.

Once they started winning, they couldn’t stop, and these following two facts can only prove what a remarkable engine it really was. Between 1968 and 1974, Cosworth engines were running the cars of every World Champion. Between 69 and 73, Cosworth engines were inside the cars of every single race winner.

Many drivers and champions attribute their successes over the years to the power in their cars, names such as Sir Jackie Stewart, Graham Hill, even Michael Schumacher.

However, as the decades wore on, the big name manufacturers began to enter and dominate the sport. Companies such as Honda, BMW and Toyota had bigger brands and bigger budgets, and teams switched allegiances all too easily.

When Jackie Stewart set up his own team in 1997, he decided to try and repay the favour to Cosworth, snapping them up as engine suppliers. The results didn’t follow, though, and after the team changed hands through Ford and Red Bull, Cosworth’s options within the sport began to run out.

In 2006, their final year, Cosworth supplied both Williams and Toro Rosso, but Williams were the first to admit it was their worst season in decades. However, not all of this can be blamed on Cosworth, as they were first on the grid to successfully make a modern V8 F1 engine rev all the way up to 20,000rpm.

Williams quickly signed Toyota as a supplier, and the fate of Cosworth appeared to be sealed. They announced that 2006 was the end for their name in the sport, and bowed out quietly in Brazil.

Afterwards, 200 staff were laid off. The company a lacked a bit of direction. The future looked bleak.

Nowadays, Cosworth say they have learnt a valuable lesson not to keep all their eggs in one motorsport basket. They are now concentrating more on the air industry with contracts including Airbus and Boeing. A return to Formula 1 is not impossible, especially as they have a homologated FIA engine sitting idle. Sadly with the wealthy domination from suppliers like Ferrari and Mercedes, that seems highly improbable.

Anyone with an affinity for Formula 1 through the years knows that Cosworth made history, and you can’t help but feel the sport isn’t the same without them.

Thanks for listening to this episode. You can leave comments about the show, or suggestions for future topics over at Sidepodcast.com. Tune in tomorrow for the last in this series of Days that Shook the F1 World.

Theme music: Dylan in the Movies, Better Days and Causeway, Change in My Lifetime.

More About the FIA Decision

The announcement from the FIA on Friday told us very little about what went on during Thursday’s Court of Appeal hearing. In fact, it would be fair to say that the FIA did pretty much everything in their power to withhold information.

Rather than revealing any detail, the official press release announced the result and then stated:

The full text of the International Court of Appeal’s decision is available, on request, from the secretariat of the FIA International Court of Appeal in Paris.

Compare if you will, how the FIA handled the McLaren spy hearing, where it was so keen for the world to hear about the penalty imposed upon McLaren, it went as far as rushing out the PDF transcripts before they’d been properly checked.

Thankfully, grandprix.com went to the trouble of playing along with the FIA’s silly little games, and published the full decision text on their site.

Reading through the document, the main thing we learn is the reason why the appeal was deemed inadmissible:

Article 1 of the Rules of Procedure of the International Court of Appeal indicates that the International Court of Appeal may hear “Appeals from decisions of the stewards of the meeting, lodged by at least one of the parties concerned”.

The International Court of Appeal finds that the term “parties concerned” in the Rules of Procedure of the International Court of Appeal does not cover all parties whose interests may be affected by the decision in question.

Basically, the stewards findings relating to the cars of Williams and BMW was none of McLaren’s business. There is however provision within the rules to allow for McLaren to protest:

The International Sporting Code has foreseen in a formal fashion that in cases such as these the only recourse would be that set out in Article 174 d of the International Sporting Code which foresees that “Protests… referring to the non-compliance of vehicles with the regulations and concerning the classification established at the end of the event shall… be made within thirty minutes of the official publication of the results.”

So McLaren made a mistake in appealing the stewards descision, when they should have, in fact, been protesting the results of the race. A minor technicality you might suggest, but an important one in the grand scheme of things. How the team managed to make such a mistake will probably be revealed soon, but no doubt at the time they believed it was the correct thing to do.

What the text doesn’t go into is the discussions that went on regarding fuel rigs and ambient temperature sensors, as discussed yesterday by Sam Michael.

The last thing to note is the costs of the appeal will be paid by McLaren. As if it hasn’t been an expensive enough year already.

Sam’s View

While the result of this week’s FIA Court of Appeal hearing may have been the correct one, the handling of the announcement shows yet again the contempt with which the FIA holds fans of Formula 1.

We have a lot to say on this subject, and tomorrow’s podcast is shaping up to be a riot, but for the moment we thought it was worth looking at the only bit of insight to so far have come out of the hearing.

Williams technical director Sam Michael, present in the courtroom on Thursday, revealed a few more details during an interview with ITV. He confirmed earlier suspicions that Formula One Management’s ambient temperature readings were not as accurate as they could have been:

FOM have a temperature sensor, but it was clear up to two years ago that that was not very accurate and was in no way accurate enough to be used as regulatory.

FOM temperature is used as a guide but sometimes it’s clear that it is inaccurate and when that happens they use Météo-France to determine what the real temperature was.

This was documented in a Sporting Working Group meeting on December 7, 2006.

Which backs up Pat Symonds thoughts on the subject back in October. It also explains why teams are contributing a large sum of money to have Météo-France turn up to each and every Grand Prix. Why they don’t just do away with FOM’s equipment altogether, remains open to debate.

Sam went on to divulge details about the paddock’s use of fuel rig temperature measuring equipment:

Sensors are different between teams up and down the grid depending on when you ordered your fuel rig.

Some of them haven’t been calibrated for seven years. They are not sealed in any way, they are not tamper-proof.

It seems like a fair question to ask why rules governing things like the temperature of fuel were created and recorded, yet nobody thought to mandate the need for some kind of standard piece of measuring equipment to enforce them? A severe lack of joined up thinking on the part of the rule makers, you might suggest.

Whether any teams have been tempted to abuse this lack of governance in the past will be the subject of much speculation in the future, I’m sure. And why, oh why, will no-one calibrate their god-damn equipment once in a while?

7 flippin’ years?